Brand damage by e-mail

by Jeff Kear on April 21, 2009 · 0 comments

Before the CAN-SPAM Act was passed, e-mail was often regarded like junk snail mail in that it was perfectly acceptable to e-mail anyone if you had their e-mail address. Since CAN-SPAM and the backlash against spammers, many organizations recognized that buying lists and blasting people relentlessly only created bad vibes and unhappy prospects. But many companies still view e-mailing people as an opportunity and not a privilege, and here’s what I mean.

A few weeks ago, I attended an event sponsored by a local association here in Denver. About a week after the event, I started getting e-mail solicitations from vendors who sponsored the event as well as other vendors who obviously bought or otherwise acquired the list from the association. I do not recall giving the association permission to pass my e-mail address along to their vendors, nor did any of the vendors ask for me to opt in when they first sent an e-mail. They simply viewed this as an opportunity to hit a new audience and did it.

I consider e-mail like this an unsolicited and unwelcome intrusion, and I’m probably in the majority here. Which means if you are sending e-mails to people who didn’t specifically ask for them from you, who you aren’t even sure if they are a good customer for you, then you are doing irreparable damage to your brand. See, I remember companies that e-mail me like this and will tell my friends “Oh, yeah, they’re the guys that spammed me a few months ago.”

Make people want to be on your e-mail list and let them choose you, because when you put them on your list and choose them, they will probably come to resent it.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Leave a Comment

Previous post: Proactive hole-poking prevents piss-poor positioning

Next post: Create a best-friend brand